<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Signal to Noise &#187; time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macvoip.com/stn/tag/time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macvoip.com/stn</link>
	<description>Teddy Wallingford, Rock and Roll CEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PC Magazine to shred print edition, but not all will do the same</title>
		<link>http://macvoip.com/stn/2008/11/19/pc-magazine-to-shred-print-edition-but-not-all-will-do-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://macvoip.com/stn/2008/11/19/pc-magazine-to-shred-print-edition-but-not-all-will-do-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Wallingford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperlocalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macvoip.com/stn/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of things I look forward to most each day is reading the paper. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s the tactile nature of the paper edition or some romantic appreciation that I hold towards the old media.  I mean, newspapers have been around since movable type was invented&#8211;hundreds and hundreds of years ago.  So there&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of things I look forward to most each day is reading the paper. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s the tactile nature of the paper edition or some romantic appreciation that I hold towards the old media.  I mean, newspapers have been around since movable type was invented&#8211;hundreds and hundreds of years ago.  So there&#8217;s a certain appeal in tradition.</p>
<p>With tradition comes a sense of comfort and rightness. But PC Magazine feels <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-ziff-davis-to-close-pcmag-print-focus-on-online-still-looking-for-optio/">neither comfortable nor right</a> about persisting with a print edition. Like the hood ornament, print zines may soon be just a luxury item.</p>
<p>Does this mean Time will go online-only?  Almost certainly not.  But the trade journals and vertical publications with a small circulation may be forced into an online-only format due to a number of reasons:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; There are just TOO MANY magazines out there.  In any given vertical, there are 3 or 4 magazines. Penton Media here in Cleveland publishes 40 or 50 vertical rags alone, many of which overlap each other in content.</p>
<p>2 &#8211; Demographic information about news consumption is easier for the publisher to obtain in an online format.</p>
<p>3 &#8211; Social media and the democratic web create &#8220;online weather systems&#8221; around news items, prevailing concepts, and fads.  It&#8217;s nearly impossible to catch a breeze from one of these online weather systems using print journalism.</p>
<p>4 &#8211; PCMag has already crossed over the &#8220;web revenue hump&#8221; that so many publishers struggle with even now.  With 70% of their brand&#8217;s revenue coming from the web, it&#8217;s pretty hard to argue in favor of keeping a costly print edition around to satisfy the old-timers.</p>
<p>5 &#8211; Blogging matters.  It used to be that print journalists, and in particular, newspaper folks, would dismiss bloggers as inaccurate, teeth-bearing, shit-stirring zealots.  As it turns out, many in the old media were of the same ilk.  Sometimes it hurts to look in the mirror.</p>
<p>6 &#8211; Community-based interests, be they purely cultural or geographic, are easier to satisfy using the web. Hyperlocalism in news coverage prevails on the web.  It&#8217;s what separates small, promising web publications like chroniclet.com from the behemoth one-size-fits all monsters like NYT.com.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;d rather read Time magazine that read a 5000-word piece on my iPhone.  I like my iPhone, but do I want to read that much on it?  No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macvoip.com/stn/2008/11/19/pc-magazine-to-shred-print-edition-but-not-all-will-do-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

