<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Signal to Noise &#187; kawasaki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macvoip.com/stn/tag/kawasaki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macvoip.com/stn</link>
	<description>Teddy Wallingford, Rock and Roll CEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Top Hollywood Celebs on Twitter, or Are They?</title>
		<link>http://macvoip.com/stn/2009/07/06/top-hollywood-celebs-on-twitter-or-are-they/</link>
		<comments>http://macvoip.com/stn/2009/07/06/top-hollywood-celebs-on-twitter-or-are-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Wallingford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kawasaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macvoip.com/stn/2009/07/06/top-hollywood-celebs-on-twitter-or-are-they/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey when a celebrity has 50,000 followers and is following 4 twits, it seems pretty obvious that Twitter has graduated in a service paradigm with secondary markets.&#160; In particular, the wrangling class of the celebrity handler.&#160; Take William Shatner, for &#8230; <a href="http://macvoip.com/stn/2009/07/06/top-hollywood-celebs-on-twitter-or-are-they/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey when a celebrity has 50,000 followers and is following 4 twits, it seems pretty obvious that Twitter has graduated in a service paradigm with secondary markets.&nbsp; In particular, the wrangling class of the celebrity handler.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Take William Shatner, for example.&nbsp; Now here&#8217;s a guy whose charisma and silly selfless sense of humore could go vast distances on Twitter&#8211;much like M.C. Hammer (whose tweets are frequent and awesomely down-to-earth).&nbsp; Yet the Shat only follows 4 people. </p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Well, because it&#8217;s not the Shat.&nbsp; It&#8217;s one of his agency people.&nbsp; I&#8217;d be surprised if the Shat and the majority of folks in his ilk even use a computer on a daily basis.&nbsp; </p>
<p>If I sound let down, it&#8217;s because I am.&nbsp; Guy Kawasaki <a href="http://om.ly/?nMd">tweeted</a> a list of Hollywood elite on Twitter. Turns out most of them are merely professionally managed, third-person twits with no more personal touch than one of their attorneys or public relations experts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macvoip.com/stn/2009/07/06/top-hollywood-celebs-on-twitter-or-are-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1231</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

