Seriously, there’s an irrational exuberance in the online apps space that beginning to sound like a droning din.  Slate, for example, is espousing qualities to net-based apps that probably aren’t as big a deal as they sound, going so far as to declare Outlook dead because Google Mail now supports Gears:

Now that Gmail has bested the Outlooks of the world, it’s a good time to assess the state of desktop software. There are some things that work better on your computer (your music app, your photo editor, your spreadsheets), and there are some that work better online (everything else).

Everything else is better online?  You mean like iMovie, or podcast production, or something secretive, or multitrack recording?   See, cloud humpers like this guy from Slate only look at software from the vantage point of office productivity–and EVEN THERE, the rationale of the Cloud’s superiority is overstated. The Cloud offers no tightly-integrated, productivity-boosting desktop environment, after all. Drag and drop? Nope. Personalized formats and preferences?  Not so much. And what about CONTROL?

Over the last few years, we’ve seen many programs shifting from the first category to the second—now you can get spreadsheets and photo editors online, though they’re still not as good as programs hosted on your computer. But e-mail has crossed the line completely. Hosted services like Gmail are now the most powerful and convenient way to grapple with a daily onslaught of mail. If you’re still tied to a desktop app—whether Outlook, the Mac’s Mail program, or anything else that sees your local hard drive, rather than a Web server, as its brain—then you’re doing it wrong.

Oh, really?   Never mind the fact that most people who choose Outlook or Entourage do so because of the benefits of Microsoft Exchange.  Not to mention the fact that it simply may not be a good idea  for Google to be the “world’s hard drive”.   Limited contigous storage is one drawback of the Google Apps / Cloud approach.  So is privacy.

Please, talk about the net-based apps with all of their qualities, pro and con, instead of all this mindless babble about how Google killed Outlook…   Come on people, think critically!

I saw Luca’s tweet about EventBox, and he’s absolutely right.  This program is super cool.  It’s for managing tweets, rss updates, facebook updates, etc etc all in one place.  So far I’m loving it. Growl notifications for updates, heads-up display.  Really cool.  Grab a copy yourself if you’re running OS X 10.5 and let me know how you like it.

Guys, here are some pictures from the last few days here on the shores of Lake Erie.  It is just absolutely brutal right now:

The iPhone was released to retail during the summer of 2007.  That means, if the features conspicuously missing from the iPhone at the time were in fact missing due to bugs, then Apple has had well over a year and a half to resolve those bugs.   Yet, in January of 2009, our iPhones still can’t send media messages, and they still can’t record video.

Moreover, any attempts to develop apps that accomplish video recording and storage or media messaging using MMS have been blocked by Apple’s Appstore Nazis.  Why?

Does Apple have something so incredibly cool up their sleeve that they’re forcing would-be competitors to the sidelines while we all waiting in Lemming-like anticipation?  I doubt it.   If Apple had something that slick and revolutionary–having to do with mms–they wouldn’t need to worry about competitors or imitators in the app store, would they?

Seriously, it’s ridicululous that I can download a multimedia Fart catalog from the app store but I still can’t take video or mms on the iPhone.

From friend Esme Vos:

Freedom to Connect, the annual event organized by David Isenberg, will be held on March 30-31, 2009 in Washington, DC. I am partnering with David to make this event fun and informative. This year is a very important one because President Barack Obama has made wired and wireless broadband – its cost, quality and availability – a major issue for his administration to tackle. Broadband is, in the eyes of the new administration, not just there for its own sake. It is a necessity for improving our lives: from the education of our children to the reduction of social isolation among seniors to efficient management of our energy grid.

There will be a lot of new people in Washington D.C. and as you have seen from the Inauguration ceremonies this week, there’s tremendous energy pushing for change. In the past, many of Freedom to Connect’s attendees have come from the FCC, various federal government agencies, the Congress and the Senate. This year we will see many new faces. We need to have a dialogue with them about the future of broadband and technological innovation in the United States.

The key topics for discussion include:
on-line, network-enabled industry and culture, new jobs and sustainable growth;
Burlington VT, where muni fiber enables business, artistic endeavor, and new telemedicine applications;
how Lafayette, Louisiana’s community came together as it built its muni fiber network;
the twin cities of Cedar Falls and Waterloo, Iowa, where one twin has a muni net, and the other doesn’t;
what municipal CIOs are planning for Seattle, Portland and San Francisco municipal fiber networks;
city nets, wired and wireless, that didn’t work – what went wrong and what we can do better;
what President Obama’s infrastructure and economic recovery plans mean for tomorrow’s network.
Sascha Meinrath (New America Foundation) and I will discuss in great detail what caused the municipal wireless networks in Philadelphia, San Francisco and other cities not to be built. Call it a post-mortem. It’s important for us to know what went wrong so we don’t make the same mistakes. We will also identify the key areas where cities and regions can use Wi-Fi networks not just to deliver public Internet access but to improve municipal and county services.

Among those who have already confirmed attendance to F2C are the CIO of San Francisco, the CTO of Seattle, the Commissioner of Telecommunications of Massachusetts and the Chair of the Vermont Telecommunications Commission, and 20-some other important shapers of the Internet who care about using it to spur economic growth, enhance participatory democracy and make our planet greener.

Get all the details, and sign up at http://freedom-to-connect.net.

Truphone announced its Truphone Anywhere application for Android mobile handsets, including the recently released G1 phone. The application is available now as a download on the Android Market in the U.K. and the U.S.

To coincide with T-Mobile’s announcement earlier this week of the availability of the G1 mobile phone in March 2009, a German version of Truphone Anywhere for Android is available and will be the first native language multi-communications application in the Android Market in Germany and Austria when it launches at CeBIT 2009.

As well as being able to make low-cost international voice calls, Truphone customers can also easily instant-message their friends across a variety of networks including MSN, Yahoo!, Google Talk and Twitter from within one Android application. Customers can also call friends anywhere in the world on Google Talk for the price of a local call, and similarly will soon will be able to instant-message and call their friends on Skype.

Truphone is also available on the Apple iPhone, the Apple iPod touch, Blackberry and Nokia devices.

Apparently, it’s not just the P2P sharers Comcast can sting with it’s 15-minute QoS demotion plan.  It appears the FCC is digging into documented allegations that Comcast can actually penalize third-party voice over IP providers if it so chooses. This is new, according to DSLReports.  Compliance with neutrality urgings from the FCC has never been mandatory (nor should it be).  But, at least in a few isolated cases, it appears Comcast has gotten away giving the competition an offer they can’t refuse.

Heh, imagine that.

I hate to rain on Gary’s parade, but the idea of dishing out another ten bucks a month to tether my laptop to my iPhone just sounds silly to me.  Maybe that’s because I read WAY between the lines.  Or, maybe it’s because I’m cheap.

Anyway, the iPhone tax is high enough as it is.  You’re in it for $100/month just to own an iPhone. This is why the non-nerdy don’t buy data plans.  But imagine the economy of scale if unlimited 3G was 50% less expensive per subscriber.  Even if AT&T can’t do that, the fact that you can’t tether your iPhone is disappointing to begin with.  Tethering should be an out of the box feature.

After all, you’re saying, when you buy an iPhone, “Hey, AT&T, I know you’re a giant customer-shafting carrier [a totally legit business model in this day and age], but I’m going to go along with your smelly customer-reviling existence because it’s the only way I can get my grubby hands on an iPhone without doing questionable things. Please, please, how about letting me tether?  It’s not like I’m going to use more simultaneous bandwidth on my laptop than I do on the iPhone by itself.”

To which AT&T replies, “No, no, no.  See, we can get $120 more bucks a year from you.”

How appropriate a thing for a big telco to say.  Reminds me of the carriers saying you can’t use a broaband router and multiple PCs on a DSL line a few years back.

  • Viagra ordre
  • Cialis en ligne
  • Levitra en ligne
  • Propecia acheter
  • Viagra acheter
  • Acheter cialis
  • Ordre levitra
  • Ordre propecia
  • En ligne viagra
  • Vente cialis
  • Levitra bon marche
  • Propecia en ligne
  • Viagra online
  • Buy cialis
  • Order Levitra
  • Buy propecia
  • Buy viagra
  • Cheap cialis
  • Cheap Levitra
  • propecia online
  • Viagra prescription
  • Cialis online
  • Buy Levitra
  • Order propecia