<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business VoIP stood still?  (A response to Ken Camp)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macvoip.com/stn/2008/07/18/business-voip-stood-still-a-response-to-ken-camp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macvoip.com/stn/2008/07/18/business-voip-stood-still-a-response-to-ken-camp/</link>
	<description>This is Ted Wallingford's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: End-to-end IP to emerge with cable companies?</title>
		<link>http://macvoip.com/stn/2008/07/18/business-voip-stood-still-a-response-to-ken-camp/comment-page-1/#comment-115321</link>
		<dc:creator>End-to-end IP to emerge with cable companies?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macvoip.com/stn/?p=691#comment-115321</guid>
		<description>[...] MSO that has stepped up and admitted that, in order to provide high quality end-to-end VoIP (as I previously griped about the telcos demonstrating no significant progress in cooperating on), a bit of inter-carrier [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MSO that has stepped up and admitted that, in order to provide high quality end-to-end VoIP (as I previously griped about the telcos demonstrating no significant progress in cooperating on), a bit of inter-carrier [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
