We spent so much time getting excited about our disruptive technology that we failed to notice the impracticality of much of what we were excited about. We, meaning those of us responsible for building up VoIP adoption and pushing for networking convergence, spent a ton of time dreaming about what the technology meant that we tended to ignore the extraneous circumstances of the industry–those cold, hard facts which make the dream remain just that– a dream.
Dream – we wanted to replace the PSTN with a global fabric of VoIP endpoints and user-centric services. IP can do it, we all know it. It’s just a matter of when, right?

Reality – The telcos continue to hold on to dated models of monetizing access to the network while forcing third-party services into premiums that cause consumers not to adopt them. Domestic cell phone calling is a great example. If I’m Joe Six Pack, am I actually going to USE Gizmo on my cell phone? Heck no, I already pay for unlimited minutes, SMS messaging, and long distance. To use Gizmo, I’ve got to add unlimited data access, too. So I’m not using it.

Dream – I am reachable at all times using one reachability token. Yeah, and it’s a SIP URI. And my wallet is filled with business cards that have SIP URIs on them instead of phone numbers. And all I have to do to add one of these tokens to my address book is click a link in a text message or an e-mail, and boom, that person is now in my address book and I can also reach them at all times using a single identification token, regardless of where they’re located, which network they’re logged in to for voice, and so on. Sounds great, but is it going to happen?

Reality – The equipment vendors entrenched in enterprise telephony act like snot-nosed brats when people like me (the annoying third-party project manager, oh great) bring up the need for SIP. So Shoretel, Cisco, Avaya, and all the rest, you guys talked a great game 5 years ago when you said “SIP is coming”. But where’s the beef? Really, you don’t support SIP in any compelling manner today, at the end of 2007. You haven’t moved forward. So I’m still handing out 3 phone numbers and an e-mail address every time I need to share my reachability tokens with somebody.

Dream – Ubiquitous wireless access would be free, open to the public, and monetized through content. VoIP for mobile would explode.

Reality – Municipalities refuse to pay for the network. Telcos won’t build the network. Nothing changes.

Dream – Telcos would realize that penalizing third-party traffic on their Internet access was a bad idea, and that they could grow revenue by growing bandwidth rather than penalizing competitors. As a result, VoIP packets would suddenly become more popular than POTS lines.

Reality – Telcos still charge too much for access while adding no value, and get caught on a regular basis penalizing (or blocking outright, how Comcastic is that?) what they view as threatening traffic. The net result–it’s harder to make money if you’re Packet8 than it is to make money selling ice cream to eskimos.

So many people have become disenchanted with the outlook for ubiquitous VoIP that many have begun to give up. Before I give up though, I want to be sure the following things aren’t going to happen:

1 – Municipal WiFi, funded by private content companies, becomes a reality in most metropolitan areas, lest we get backed into paying for WiMax from Ma Bell, which is what’s going to happen.

2 – The telcos begin playing fair with other peoples’ traffic or get out of the way.

3 – Google is successful at moving cell phones with WiFI chipsets that can take advantage of open networks subsidized by content-related revenue (cause Bell sure as sh*t isn’t going to do that).

4 – Apple’s contract with AT&T expires and iChat VoIP becomes popular on the iPhone.

5 -Â Cisco, Avaya, Nortel, Shoretel, and the others wake up and start playing the SIP game instead of just talking about it.

Is it? I don’t think so. General news, even that of the hyperlocal variety, isn’t something you can get people to pay for. The New York Times tried and failed at it with their web site. I think there’s good reason for this. People don’t want to pay for news, no matter how “zero day” it is. And the reason?  News will get to them–some way or some how, it will get to them without payment.  And people won’t pay for news.

Obviously in certain verticals, this isn’t the case. And delivered in certain substrates, such as a printed magazine (which takes months to copyedit and layout and weeks to print and distribute), people may pay a subscription fee. But generally speaking, paying for news is just so 1987.

So how do news media make it up? Content, content, content. Newspaper publishers, listen up. The way to attract revenue is to build social communities. Facebook is demonstrating this lesson, capturing the hearts and minds of news consumers that the newspaper will never, ever have a legitimate shot at unless they learn this lesson too.

Gosh I wish I could’ve made it to Boston this Fall. Between kids and work, it’s been a very busy time. Looking forward to Spring! (We always look forward to spring here in Cleveland.)

Sorry posts have been so sparse. I’ve been swamped.
So much has changed in the world of IP communications, it’s hard to even keep track of the latest offerings from major vendors, but one thing that remains consistent since the beginning of the IP phone revolution is this: The phone, though largely outdated by recent advances in networking, remains shoehorned into IP communications solutions like a piece of legacy baggage.

Here’s what I mean. With desktop software systems offering a new model for voice communications–one tied to social networking and based on URIs instead of phone numbers, we insist on providing support for the old way, as if our constant cow-towing to the desk telephone’s engineering requirements and traditions is going to make it easier for people to step into this brave new world of IP communications.

There are a ton of reasons why we continue to be in love with the desk phone.  It’s familiar, even if its features haven’t changed much in the last 10 years or so. It’s solid, even if it’s immobile. It’s capital, unlike software, even if it’s expensive. (IP phones routinely cost $500+/year to support including maintenance and licensing.)

In a world where everybody has a smart phone, an active directory credential, access to three to five social networks, good web surfing skills, and a high-powered laptop, I find myself wondering more and more why the desk phone continues to be as pervasive as it is. I was at a Shoretel demonstration yesterday for one of my clients and it became clear that, despite the fact that innovation on the desk phone is sooo over, these trusty ornaments of the desktop are here to stay.

The idea of the “phone system” is what needs to change. Phone conversations are a single medium increasingly enabled by protocols that work in other media, too. The SIP protocol isn’t just for phone systems, yet that’s what it’s getting used for in the enterprise. But try explaining to a “phone system” vendor like Shoretel that the way they’re thinking about their flagship product is a dead-end way of thinking.

Folks, the phone system is dead. Innovation lies in our ability to wrangle the various mediums of communication that are available to us into a common substrate. Microsoft Office Communications Server is great step in this direction. Thing is, the phone system isn’t a PBX any more. Instead, the phone system is the network and its applications. And as such, it’s not a phone system. It’s a communications approach.

Yet the phone system vendors push PBX like it’s the only way to look at communications in the enterprise, this despite e-mail, which has been around twenty years and has never worked optimally with PBX functionality nearby. Even Cisco is guilty of this. Sell a hardphone and you sell a seat license, it’s as simple as that. That’s why PBX vendors are so enamored of desk telephones. It’s time to get over it.  We don’t need desk phones to communicate in the enterprise–indeed, sometimes desk phones are counterproductive.

When we have document sharing, web conferencing, voice and video over IP, instant messaging and presence, location awareness, file transfer, cell phones, and so many other mediums of communication at our fingertips, why do the blue chip phone vendors always want us to buy a hardphone to enable things?

At first blush, Office Communications Server sounded like a flash in the pan like ISA Server, but on this point–the phone system is no longer–I think Microsoft understands better than anybody, perhaps even better than Cisco, what the future holds.

  • Viagra ordre
  • Cialis en ligne
  • Levitra en ligne
  • Propecia acheter
  • Viagra acheter
  • Acheter cialis
  • Ordre levitra
  • Ordre propecia
  • En ligne viagra
  • Vente cialis
  • Levitra bon marche
  • Propecia en ligne
  • Viagra online
  • Buy cialis
  • Order Levitra
  • Buy propecia
  • Buy viagra
  • Cheap cialis
  • Cheap Levitra
  • propecia online
  • Viagra prescription
  • Cialis online
  • Buy Levitra
  • Order propecia