So as not to confuse the issues of authentication of identity and personal identity management (which is what Alec has been bloviating about), let me just say that, despite my DNS rant yesterday, which had very little to do with his point and everything to do with security and authentication, I agree with Alec.  Case in point: Phoneboy’s Skype status still says Gobble Gobble. Perhaps if he had a single central identity management solution, it would say Happy New Year instead!

I’ve decided to try an experiment. Most of my Apache web log traffic appears to come from people that scrape my headlines frequently using an RSS reader of one sort or another.  So, I’m going to try to use my blog to find out who these people are. If you match the descriptions that follow, feel free to contact me on the Sitofono link in the sidebar:

  • A Charter customer in the Marquette, MI area. You read my headlines a ton. Either you’re a closet plaigiarist or you really like my blog. Who are you?
  • A Comcast customer in Georgia. 3126 hits in 28 days? Let me guess, you must be the guy sending all the viagra comments to me.
  • A Northeast Ohioan using Roadrunner with telco-owned CPE. 828 hits in 28 days; not bad at all. How about posting a comment some time?
  • OK, just who the heck is tide533.microsoft.com? You’re sucking my hosting buddy’s bandwidth like crazy.
  • A few months ago, one of my posts made the rounds at Avaya and I got like a zillion hits from Avaya. This time around, it’s Nortel. Hey, people at Nortel, who are you?

I hate it when things we invest a lot of mental energy turn out to be relatively insignificant in the end. So, in some way it bothers me that there are people ready to pronounce certain products or services as worthy of a “3.0″ label. Semantically speaking, who cares. But this is about (as are many things in the realm of social science) really more about philosophy.

Andy pointed to VoIP News’s comments about the 2.0 monicre (I disagree with VoIP News’s definition of 2.0). And he expanded on the definition of the various phases of IP-tel and social telephony applications. Andy categorizes them into 4 groups: 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0. 1.0 being POTS and the PSTN. 1.5 being Vonage and others like it. 2.0 being Skype and its ilk. And 3.0 being something which bridges the gap between 1.0 and 2.0.

But I’ve always looked at 2.0 as a standard-bearer for two things that have little to do with grouping service providers based upon their chronology and similarity of features. Those two things are (1) the user gains more freedom and (2) the community gains more content. So, when I do my break down of “who’s a 1.0 and who’s a 2.0″ I come up with basically the same answer as Andy does, but perhaps using a slightly different formula. Rather than basing it on which startup did what when, I look at which startup empowered users and emboldened some form of community content creation. If they did both with their project, I call it a 2.0 product/service. If they didn’t, I don’t. Skype and Sightspeed are probably the absolute shining examples of 2.0 stuff when you define it in this way. By the way, so is Gabcast. iTunes, conversely, is not.

Notice how the definition has nothing necessarily to do with telephony. That’s because telephony is one cog in the philisophical machine driving the thought behind the whole 2.0 idea–and not its endgame. (Note the parallel with Ken Camp’s recent comment about the realization the VoIP isn’t the end, but just a means to it.)
Problem is, all this labeling doesn’t amount to jack squat if it doesn’t mean anything to the majority of the users whom we’d all love to sweep away with our fascinating converged solutions. Unfortunately, on the eve of 2007, we’re still at that point. To businesspeople, perhaps 2.0 means something. To the readers of this blog, it probably means quite a bit. To the vast majority of my clientelle, the challenge with 2.0 has been getting it to WORK, because the underlying technologies are still developing virgins. That’s been a frustration for many of my clients. The old phrase, “when it works, it works well” certainly applies. To go back to the chronological/features formula for a minute, Andy’s 1.0s are masters of their technologies because the standards have been in place for decades, even as far back as the late nineteenth century in some applications of the PSTN. Andy’s 1.5s have done a damn good job mimicking the 1.0s’ functionality as a means of ciphoning revenue by using the Internet as an alternative transport to reach the consumer. Andy’s 2.0s are a straight-up gamble, and just about none of them are in the black.
So to make the leap to 3.0 at this point seems a bit premature. I’m not suggesting anybody has labeled any particular service a 3.0 service, but I am cautioning against it. And my reason is this: looking at 2.0 in an objective way, what have we really accomplished for Joe Six Pack and Jane Doe?  Sure, Phoneboy and Andy Abramson and Ken Camp and Alecs (sorry Alec!) all dig these services and use ‘em plenty, but these are guys on the leading edge. I use them myself, but am I going to be alone in saying that 2.0 has NOT revolutionized my telecomm habits?  Either I’m hopelessly out of sync with my associates or I’m a pretty good empath of Joe Consumer’s worldview.

The point is, and my reason for cautioning against jumping the 3.0 gun is, we really haven’t DONE anything with 2.0 yet. The whole philosophy of 2.0 is to draw in the collective community to create new content, be it accessibility or knowledge, and to empower individual consumer freedom. Can anybody truly say we’ve accomplished that yet?  We’ve only just started to chip away at what we all know is REALLY possible.

The current philosophy in applications and networking is the RIGHT ONE. User freedom + community = 2.0.  We haven’t finishing APPLYING our work in Voice 2.0, and we have a long way to go–politically, technically, evangelically. And perhaps that is what’s meant by 3.0: making 2.0 concepts work in a 1.0 world.  But can they? Can the freedom/community philosophy be truly expressed in a 1.0 world (driven by a dictator/isolation philosophy), or will it just simmer under the profit surface watching startups come and go with new version numbers?

Scrolling through my RSS headlines and did a double-take. What’s up with THAT? Leanne hasn’t posted in 10 days. I hope everything’s ok and she’s just having an extragood holiday. Perhaps she’s grown bored of all the fame and fortune ubergeek blog celebrity can bring a person!

The identity problem goes way beyond presence, and way beyond telephony even. I define identity as the trust of another node’s credentials, be they human or machine. I am who I say am. And WHY? Because I am trusted. As trust can only be established by an authority, we have a real problem on our hands.

But it’s not a problem that’s new.

Take DNS. The fact that we, as thought leaders, haven’t solved the dilemma of securing the identity of domain wielders is a shame. This is why e-mail spam is consuming a pathetic amount of bandwidth, and also why old friends like Carl Sassenrath and even Tom Keating have been forced to “privatize” their e-mail.

Comment spam on blogs would also be eradicated if we all subscribed to a common trust authority for domain-wielding credentials. And prosecuting abusers would simplified. Everybody wins, right? You would think Google would be on this concept like white on rice. (How much Goobandwidth is sucked up by spiders crawling splogs and spam comments designed to enrich page rank for such nefarious keywords as ‘pissing’, ‘ugg boots’, and ‘hillary duff naked’?)
Of course, creating a centralized authority for granting domain-wielding identity might not be easy. There IS that painful little issue of privacy. And of course, the entire industries that have sprung up to counter the abuse of software aren’t lobbying really hard for a central identity authority. Plus, you’d be hardpressed to push this through as law without some knuckleheaded buttnut Ivy League professor labeling it as some “unilateral move” designed to disenfranchise SOMEBODY.

But I digress. There is good news, however. My Strep is almost gone.


Youtube on the Wii

Originally uploaded by pantheonMan.

Here is a snap of a Youtube video as seen on Opera running on the Nintendo Wii. What’s really cool about web-surfing on the Wii is that I can do it from the comfort of my own couch. What’s really poor about it is that I don’t have the progressive scan hook-up for our Wii (nor does the Wii support 1080p) so the experience isn’t as exciting as it should be. But the user interface elements–namely the Wiimote itself. MAN has Nintendo figured out living room web surfing!  I can’t wait to see what those clever Nintendo people come up with next.

Nortel gets to part with 2 and a half billion, thanks to a judge’s decision to remunerate the company’s shareholders for some black accounting that took place as early as 2001. That’s a lesson you don’t want to learn twice: be honest to your shareholders; be honest to your customers.

I’m going to sign off for a few days to celebrate the holiday. I hope that all of your cups are full this Christmas, and all your spirits lifted. We live in a wonderful land at a wonderful time, and there is so much promise this time of year–offline and on. Enjoy your holiday and take time to reflect and regroup.  And I’ll see you all again next week.

To keep in the spirit of the holiday, here’s a passage from the second chapter of Luke:

1In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. 2(This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria.) 3And everyone went to his own town to register.

4So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. 5He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child. 6While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, 7and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn.

8And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. 9An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. 10But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. 11Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord. 12This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.”13Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying,
14“Glory to God in the highest,
and on earth peace to men on whom his favor rests.”

15When the angels had left them and gone into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, “Let’s go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.”

16So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby, who was lying in the manger. 17When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, 18and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them. 19But Mary treasured up all these things and pondered them in her heart. 20The shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things they had heard and seen, which were just as they had been told.

21On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise him, he was named Jesus, the name the angel had given him before he had been conceived.22When the time of their purification according to the Law of Moses had been completed, Joseph and Mary took him to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord 23(as it is written in the Law of the Lord, “Every firstborn male is to be consecrated to the Lord”), 24and to offer a sacrifice in keeping with what is said in the Law of the Lord: “a pair of doves or two young pigeons.”

25Now there was a man in Jerusalem called Simeon, who was righteous and devout. He was waiting for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him. 26It had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not die before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. 27Moved by the Spirit, he went into the temple courts. When the parents brought in the child Jesus to do for him what the custom of the Law required, 28Simeon took him in his arms and praised God, saying:
29“Sovereign Lord, as you have promised,
you now dismiss your servant in peace.
30For my eyes have seen your salvation,
31which you have prepared in the sight of all people,
32a light for revelation to the Gentiles
and for glory to your people Israel.”

  • Viagra ordre
  • Cialis en ligne
  • Levitra en ligne
  • Propecia acheter
  • Viagra acheter
  • Acheter cialis
  • Ordre levitra
  • Ordre propecia
  • En ligne viagra
  • Vente cialis
  • Levitra bon marche
  • Propecia en ligne
  • Viagra online
  • Buy cialis
  • Order Levitra
  • Buy propecia
  • Buy viagra
  • Cheap cialis
  • Cheap Levitra
  • propecia online
  • Viagra prescription
  • Cialis online
  • Buy Levitra
  • Order propecia